<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing Tips That Work ... From My Kitchen Table&#187; More on 000 follows per day rule :  Marketing Tips That Work : From My Kitchen Table : Social Media Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frommykitchentable.com/tag/000-follows-per-day-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frommykitchentable.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s New 1,000 Follows Per Day Rule Shoots Loyal Twitterers Down</title>
		<link>http://www.frommykitchentable.com/social-marketing/twitter-social-marketing/twitters-new-1000-follows-per-day-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.frommykitchentable.com/social-marketing/twitter-social-marketing/twitters-new-1000-follows-per-day-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 follows per day rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail Whale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frommykitchentable.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter just decided to implement a new limit &#8211; the 1000 follows a day&#160; rule. This new rule will affect everyone who follows new people on a regular basis. It will even affect those who just follow back their big lists of followers. So I decided to share what I&#8217;ve found out in this Marketing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frommykitchentable.com%2Fsocial-marketing%2Ftwitter-social-marketing%2Ftwitters-new-1000-follows-per-day-rule%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frommykitchentable.com%2Fsocial-marketing%2Ftwitter-social-marketing%2Ftwitters-new-1000-follows-per-day-rule%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><strong>Twitter</strong> just decided to implement a new limit &#8211; the <strong>1000 follows a day&nbsp; rule</strong>. This new rule will affect everyone who follows new people on a regular basis. It will even affect those who just follow back their big lists of followers. So I decided to share what I&#8217;ve found out in this <strong>Marketing Tip</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s Wrong With This New Twitter Rule? </strong></p>
<p>No one knew about it or that it was coming! It seems that <strong>Twitter</strong> admin did not have the <span class="zem_slink">common courtesy</span> to report this new rule/limit to their loyal followers. This new feature was not even written about on the support section of the <strong>Twitter</strong> help blog till Monday, 4/20/09. That&#8217;s when <strong>Twitter </strong>officially announced that this limit is for real.</p>
<p>They say they are trying to optimize the follow limit for good <strong>Twitter</strong> people who auto-follow other people. What&#8217;s wrong with this picture? Everyone thought it was a bug. Yep, me too.</p>
<p><strong>So&#8230; why did Twitter do this?</strong><span id="more-251"></span></p>
<p>One reason could be that in the past few days <strong>Twitter</strong> has experienced a very slow performance from their servers. This could be from the 1 million auto-follows from @britneyspears maybe? Or it could be from the Kutcher/CNN <span class="zem_slink">faceoff</span>! Maybe it&#8217;s happening just because everyone wants to use an auto-follow tool. Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong, the auto-follow feature of these 3rd party programs is very cool, so cool that everyone wants to have them. Face it, <strong>Twitter</strong> is becoming automated, it can&#8217;t keep up.</p>
<p>The<strong> Twitter <span class="zem_slink">Fail Whale</span></strong> probably doesn’t like all the bots/scripts, that people are using, picking on him. So&#8230; the more people who use these new automated tools, the more often the <strong>Fail Whale </strong>shows up. So <strong>Twitter </strong>admin decided&#8230; <strong>lets slow up the show!</strong> It&#8217;s probably a very <span class="zem_slink">good idea</span> in actuality, but the worst mistake <strong>Twitter </strong>made was not to inform anyone about it.</p>
<p>The second bad idea that <strong>Twitter </strong>had was to just implement a dump restriction without first testing if it would be effective. It doesn&#8217;t seem like there is a real <span class="zem_slink">Google</span>-like algorithm to it. There seems to be no genuine reason behind it that can optimize and help the experience of those <strong>Twittering</strong>. It also seems there is nothing good in it for the real big guys on<strong> Twitter</strong>. They are miffed!</p>
<p><strong>So&#8230; WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO US TWITTER?</strong></p>
<p>Maybe after thousands of&nbsp; support tickets and millions of negative discussions on the internet the <strong>Twitter</strong> team will deactivate this limit or at least tell us how to optimize it for our own good. We can always hope.</p>
<p><strong>What do all you Twitter fans think?</strong></p>
<p>Was this the best idea that a big, super company like <strong>Twitter</strong> could have come up with? Was it fair to all the people who are loyal, <strong>Tweeting</strong> fans of <strong>Twitter</strong>? The ones who, like me, try to follow all the rules and use this great <span class="zem_slink">social marketing</span> site as a tool to help build their <span class="zem_slink">marketing</span> network.</p>
<p>Who knows what<strong> Twitter</strong> will come up with next. Maybe a link or <strong>RT</strong> limit? Scary stuff <strong>Twitter</strong> fans. Hope this <strong><a href="http://weh82w8ok.turbogen.hop.clickbank.net"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);"  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.frommykitchentable.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" title="Twitter Marketing Tool I Recommend" rel="external">Twitter Marketing</a> Tip</strong> helped. I&#8217;d like to&nbsp; hear your comments.</p>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/fa7a0a58-079f-481e-8e13-857eb89c4d48/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none ; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=fa7a0a58-079f-481e-8e13-857eb89c4d48" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frommykitchentable.com/social-marketing/twitter-social-marketing/twitters-new-1000-follows-per-day-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
